Zombadings

Introduction: The Phenomenon of Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings

Overview

Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings, also known by its full Filipino title Zombadings 1: Patayin sa Shokot si Remington (loosely, Kill Remington with Fear), emerged in 2011 as a distinctive and provocative entry in contemporary Philippine cinema. Directed by Jade Castro, the film garnered attention for its audacious blend of disparate genres, weaving together elements of horror, comedy, romance, coming-of-age narrative, and science fiction, all filtered through a distinctly queer lens. Its premise—a homophobic young man cursed to turn gay while a serial killer targets the local queer community and zombies rise—immediately signaled its unconventional approach. Often cited as potentially the first Filipino “gay zombie movie,” Zombadings occupies a unique space within both national and transnational genre landscapes.  

Impact and Controversy

The film achieved notable success, transitioning from its premiere as the closing film of the prestigious Cinemalaya Independent Film Festival to a profitable mainstream theatrical run in the Philippines. This crossover appeal, fueled by positive word-of-mouth, marked it as a significant independent production capable of reaching a wider audience. However, this success was accompanied by significant controversy. While many lauded the film for its humor, originality, and subversive potential—celebrating it as entertaining, cleverly crafted, and carrying a message of tolerance —others condemned its reliance on harmful stereotypes, its central “curse” narrative, and its comedic treatment of sensitive issues like hate crimes. This fundamental tension between celebration and condemnation forms the core of the film’s complex reception history and enduring legacy.  

Report Scope

This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings, drawing exclusively upon the provided research materials. It will synthesize information regarding the film’s plot, creators, production background, narrative and stylistic elements, thematic concerns—particularly its engagement with LGBTQ+ representation, homophobia, and tolerance within a Filipino cultural context—and its divided critical and audience reception, concluding with its current streaming availability.

Genesis and Production: Crafting a Queer Zombie Comedy

Detailed Plot Synopsis

Concurrently, the curse begins to manifest. Remington experiences strange dreams involving a muscular, S&M-clad figure and a mysterious pink scarf. He undergoes a gradual transformation: his body hair disappears overnight, he becomes neater and more sensitive, develops stereotypically gay mannerisms and speech patterns (“bekimon”), and finds himself increasingly attracted to his best friend, Jigs (Kerbie Zamora), creating a complicated love triangle.  

Seeking to reverse the transformation, Remington, Hannah, and Jigs track down Pops. They learn the curse can only be broken if a “purely heterosexual man” willingly chooses to become gay in Remington’s place. Their efforts are complicated by the revelation that the serial killer is Remington’s godfather, Suarez (Daniel Fernando), a closeted homosexual motivated by homophobia, who uses a scientific “gaydar” gun to target his victims.  

The climax involves a chaotic confrontation during Remington’s 21st birthday party. Suarez murders Pops, but Pops’ grieving page boy resurrects him and other murdered gay men as zombies—the titular “zombadings”—who attack the town festival. In a moment of paternal love and acceptance, Remington’s father, Ed (John Regala), steps in front of Suarez’s gaydar gun, declaring his son is not gay and willingly taking the curse upon himself just before midnight, thus saving Remington.  

In the aftermath, life in Lucban returns to a semblance of normality, albeit altered. Remington prepares to leave for studies in Manila, Hannah starts her business, and Ed lives happily as an openly gay man alongside his accepting wife, Fe. Suarez and his cohort Serge are buried together, while Pops and the zombadings establish a hat-weaving cooperative. The film ends with a young boy observing a gay man and remarking on his beauty, suggesting a potential shift in perspective.  

Key Personnel & Production Details

The film was helmed by director Jade Castro, known for his earlier independent film Endo (2007) and work within the mainstream Star Cinema system. Castro co-wrote the screenplay with Raymond Lee and Michiko Yamamoto, both accomplished figures in Philippine cinema. Lee, also a producer, has writing credits including Anak and Milan and produced the acclaimed Ang Pagdadalaga ni Maximo Oliveros; Yamamoto penned scripts for Magnifico and Maximo Oliveros.  

The cast featured a mix of young stars and veterans. Martin Escudero, a product of the reality talent show Starstruck, was launched to leading man status as Remington. Lauren Young portrayed the love interest Hannah, and Kerbie Zamora played the best friend Jigs. Veteran actors Janice De Belen and John Regala played Remington’s parents, Fe and Ed, while comedy stalwart Roderick Paulate delivered a pivotal performance as the curse-wielding Pops Ricafuerte. Notable supporting roles were filled by Eugene Domingo, Daniel Fernando, and Marian Rivera in a cameo as an albularyo (folk healer).  

Zombadings was the first output of Origin8 Media, described as an “all-writers group” aiming to produce independent films with mainstream potential. Other production companies involved include Reality Entertainment, SQ Film Laboratories, and Post Manila. The film was shot primarily on location in Lucban, Quezon, a town noted for its Pahiyas festival and perceived gay-friendly atmosphere, with additional scenes filmed in Manila.  

After its closing night premiere at the Cinemalaya Independent Film Festival in July 2011, Zombadings received a wide theatrical release in the Philippines on August 31, 2011. It was granted a PG-13 rating by the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) without cuts, a decision welcomed by the producers for allowing broader audience access. The film proved to be a box office success, grossing between Php 32.2 million and Php 37 million (approximately US$800,000).  

Core Film Details

Feature	Detail
Title (Filipino)	Zombadings 1: Patayin sa Shokot si Remington
Title (English)	Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings
Director	Jade Castro
Writers	Jade Castro, Raymond Lee, Michiko Yamamoto
Key Cast	Martin Escudero (Remington), Lauren Young (Hannah), Kerbie Zamora (Jigs), Roderick Paulate (Pops), Janice De Belen (Fe), John Regala (Ed), Eugene Domingo (Mrs. Montano)
Production Companies	Origin8 Media, Reality Entertainment, SQ Film Laboratories, Post Manila
Release Date (PH)	August 31, 2011 (Wide); July 2011 (Cinemalaya)
Genre(s)	Comedy, Horror, Romance, Satire, Coming-of-Age, Queer Cinema
Runtime	Approx. 96 minutes

Экспортировать в Таблицы

The Origin Story

The genesis of Zombadings is directly linked to a personal experience of one of its screenwriters and producers, Raymond Lee, who identifies as a transwoman. While vacationing in Lucban, a town generally considered gay-friendly, Lee was walking alone when a young boy, around five or six years old, passed by and yelled “Bakla!” at him. Lee was struck by the “tinge of hate” in the boy’s voice, suggesting it was learned behavior. This encounter sparked the core concept for the film: a boy who habitually mocks gay people encounters someone who curses him to become gay himself when he grows up.  

This origin provides crucial context for understanding the filmmakers’ stated intentions. Lee and Castro framed the project as a reaction against the pressure to portray only positive, assimilationist depictions of gay life, questioning the need for gay characters to always be “masculine, good-looking upstanding citizens” adhering to traditional norms. Instead, they aimed to explore themes of prejudice, acceptance, and tolerance through the narrative device of the curse. The curse, in this framing, functions less as a literal statement that being gay is negative, and more as a catalyst forcing the homophobic protagonist to confront his prejudice by experiencing “the thing he fears most” —a transformative journey akin to those in fairy tales, as Lee himself suggested by comparing the plot to Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, and Shrek. This intended meaning, rooted in an experience of homophobia and aimed at fostering empathy, stands in contrast to the more literal, negative interpretations of the curse that fueled much of the film’s controversy. The film’s premise also echoes earlier Filipino comedies like Petrang Kabayo, which featured a character cursed at birth, suggesting an engagement with local cinematic traditions.  

Filmmaking Context

Zombadings emerged from the vibrant Philippine independent film scene, often referred to as “indies”. Produced by Origin8 Media, a group founded by writers including Lee and Castro, the film represented an effort to create unique stories that could bridge the gap between the festival circuit, like Cinemalaya where it premiered, and mainstream commercial viability. This ambition existed within a system that Castro found frustrating, where major studios often prioritized star casting over the story itself.  

The film’s independent production is reflected in its aesthetics. Critics frequently noted its low-budget nature, pointing to “low-rent” or “bargain-basement” special effects. However, this was often framed as part of its charm, contributing to its “cheap and cheesy” but pleasurable campiness. Despite potential budgetary limitations, the film received the highest grade, “A,” from the Cinema Evaluation Board (CEB) of the Philippines. The CEB lauded its originality, entertainment value, and humor, positioning it favorably against the more formulaic films dominating the market at the time.  

Narrative, Genre, and Style: Deconstructing Zombadings

Genre Blending and the Unique ‘Zombading’

A defining characteristic of Zombadings is its deliberate and exuberant mixing of genres. It defies easy categorization, drawing elements from Horror, Comedy, Romance, Science Fiction (with the “gaydar” gun), Musical interludes, Coming-of-Age narratives, and Queer cinema. Director Jade Castro acknowledged the challenge of this “mash-up,” emphasizing the need to balance political incorrectness with comedy and horror. The filmmakers were described as “ingeniously showering the film with elements” from these diverse genres, a strategy seen by some critics as key to its subversive potential and commercial appeal within the Philippine context, where such blends are often profitable. This hybridity contributes significantly to the film’s unique tone – simultaneously funny, bizarre, satirical, and even possessing moments of emotional sincerity.  

The film introduces a novel cinematic monster: the “zombading.” The term itself is a portmanteau, combining “zombie” with “bading,” a colloquial and culturally specific Filipino term derived from “bakla”. “Bakla” and “bading” encompass a range of identities adjacent to, but distinct from, Western LGBTQ+ categories, including same-sex desire, effeminate gender expression, and transgender identity. The film’s use of “zombading,” coined by its gay and trans creators, engages with these local nuances.  

The zombie element in Zombadings subverts typical horror conventions. While zombies are present, the emphasis is less on gore and terror and more on camp, absurdity, and “fabulousness”. The zombadings are, significantly, the resurrected victims of homophobic violence, brought back seemingly for vengeance or justice. Their ultimate fate, however, is ambiguous; initially appearing pestilent , they later seem organized into a productive community of hat weavers, a confusing endpoint that complicates their role.  

Metaphorically, the zombading functions on multiple levels. It embodies the concept of the zombie as a “blank canvas” for social commentary, specifically representing marginalized queer identities. Their resurrection can be read as a fantasy of queer resilience and supernatural vengeance against oppression, reversing the typical narrative where marginalized figures are victims. Yet, the hat-weaving conclusion introduces ambiguity, potentially satirizing societal expectations of productivity or offering a perplexing vision of integration.  

Narrative Structure and Style

At its core, Zombadings follows a coming-of-age trajectory for Remington, framed within a fairy tale structure involving a curse, a transformation, and a quest for reversal. However, the execution of this narrative drew criticism for its structure. One review described the storytelling as “at best unwieldy” and “labyrinthine,” employing a “palabok” style—characterized by excessive subplots, detours focusing on town characters, and “kwentuhan” (chatting)—which allegedly detracted from the film’s rhythm, tempo, and comedic potential. This reviewer speculated that the filmmakers might have opted for this digressive style (“palabok and endless digressing”) to compensate for a perceived thinness in the central plot.  

Conversely, other analyses praised the film’s ability to cohere despite its seemingly disparate and chaotic elements. Terms like “miraculously cohere” were used, and Castro’s direction was likened to that of a “maverick conductor” skillfully managing traditionally jarring components to create an enjoyable whole. This suggests that while the narrative structure might deviate from conventional linearity, it could be interpreted either as a flaw hindering focus or as a deliberate, culturally inflected style (“stylishly Pinoy” ) that successfully integrates the film’s multifaceted ambitions.  

Aesthetic and Linguistic Choices

The film’s visual style is consistently described as low-budget, campy, cheesy, outlandish, and absurd. This aesthetic is evident in elements like the “bright pink CG animated scarf” that haunts Remington , the comically conceived “gaydar” gun used by the killer , the overall visual presentation critiqued by one viewer as having “TV-style framing” , and the intentionally non-realistic depiction of the zombadings. While the low-budget effects were noted as a drawback by some , others saw this cheapness as integral to the film’s charm and pleasure.  

Linguistically, the film prominently features “bekimon” or “bekispeak,” the evolving patois or slang associated with gay culture in the Philippines. This queer subcultural language, previously known as “swardspeak,” is used by characters, particularly Remington as he transforms, and is presented with subtitles (reportedly yellow in some versions) for broader comprehension. Screenwriter Raymond Lee explicitly viewed the inclusion of bekimon not as a gimmick but as a celebration of a living, evolving language, arguing against the stigma sometimes attached to it and other coded languages like “jejemon”. The use of bekimon grounds the film firmly in its specific Filipino cultural context and contributes significantly to its humor and unique voice. The combination of camp aesthetics, genre-bending, potentially unconventional narrative structure, and culturally specific language choices reflects the film’s position within Philippine independent cinema, balancing creative expression and low-budget realities with an aim for broad audience engagement.  

Themes in Focus: Queerness, Homophobia, and Filipino Culture

Portrayal of LGBTQ+ Identities

Zombadings engages directly with Filipino queer identities, specifically ‘bading’ and ‘bakla’. These terms, as used in the film and discussed in analyses, represent complex subjectivities that are not direct equivalents of Western LGBTQ+ categories, encompassing diverse expressions of gender nonconformity and same-sex desire. The film depicts a spectrum within ‘kabaklaan’ (bakla-ness), including masculine-presenting gay men (‘pamin’), feminine men (‘pagirl’, ‘effem’), and trans women (‘transpinays’), acknowledging the fluidity and inclusivity often associated with these terms.  

However, the film’s representation of these identities drew significant criticism for its heavy reliance on stereotypes. Critics pointed to depictions of gay men as exclusively flamboyant, effeminate, sexually predatory, prone to catfights, and inherently desiring to be women. This led to accusations that the film presented a “singular,” outdated view of gay men, promoting ridicule and reinforcing harmful, heterosexist assumptions about gender.  

Conversely, defenses of the film argued that these stereotypes were employed subversively or satirically , or that they reflected the actual diversity within the ‘bakla’ community, including those who embrace flamboyant presentation. The casting of Roderick Paulate, an actor iconic for his roles in Filipino “drag queen slapstick” comedies, was seen as lending credibility to this approach, making the use of stereotypes potentially more palatable as part of a recognized local cinematic tradition. The film utilizes “clichés of gay-acting” , particularly in Escudero’s performance, which was praised for navigating these tropes effectively. Furthermore, the concept of ‘kabaklaan’ itself is analyzed as encompassing a performative sensibility that often involves joking about serious matters, a form of postcolonial camp.  

The ‘Curse’ Controversy

The central plot device—Remington being cursed to turn gay as punishment for his homophobia—proved to be the film’s most contentious element. Critics vehemently argued that this premise inherently frames homosexuality as a negative affliction, a punishment, the “worst thing that can happen,” and something that requires a “cure”. This interpretation views the film as reinforcing societal prejudice and ignorance, directly contradicting the psychiatric consensus that homosexuality is not a disorder and echoing harmful “curing” practices.  

This critical reading stands in stark contrast to the filmmakers’ stated intent and alternative interpretations. Rooted in screenwriter Lee’s personal encounter with hate speech , the curse was potentially conceived as a narrative tool to force empathy and understanding upon the homophobic protagonist. It compels Remington to metaphorically “walk in the shoes of what you abhor” , undergoing a transformation that challenges his worldview. Framing the narrative as a fairy tale further positions the curse as a familiar trope initiating a transformative journey, rather than a literal judgment on the value of being gay. This stark divergence in interpretation—between seeing the curse as inherently homophobic versus viewing it as a satirical or empathetic device—highlights the inherent risks and complexities of using potentially negative tropes in queer narratives, especially within comedic or genre frameworks. The controversy underscores the difficulty of ensuring intended meaning aligns with audience reception when dealing with sensitive representations of marginalized groups.  

Engaging with Homophobia and Tolerance

The film explicitly engages with homophobia, primarily through Remington’s initial behavior of mocking and taunting gay individuals. It satirizes this prejudice, most obviously through the curse itself, which literally turns the homophobe’s fear into his reality. The narrative also incorporates the serious issue of anti-gay violence through the serial killer subplot. However, the film’s comedic treatment of these hate crimes became another point of controversy, with critics finding it “troubling” and arguing that it made light of real-world violence. The filmmakers, however, contended they were not making fun of the hate crimes themselves.  

Zombadings is frequently described as carrying a “pro-tolerance message” and being a “document of empowerment” and a “blow against intolerance”. This message is conveyed through Remington’s forced transformation leading to potential enlightenment, the ultimate acceptance shown by his parents, particularly his father , and the hopeful final scene suggesting changing attitudes. However, some critiques argued that the film aims merely for “tolerance” rather than full “acceptance” or “respect,” citing lines where gay people are deemed acceptable primarily for their utility or occasional okay-ness. These themes resonate within the Filipino cultural context, playing against the backdrop of Lucban’s “gay-friendly” image which nonetheless harbors underlying prejudice , and emphasizing the importance of family and community support systems.  

Subverting Machismo and Gender Roles

The film also offers a critique of traditional Filipino machismo and gender roles. Remington begins as a “stereotypical macho boy next door” , whose identity is fundamentally challenged by his involuntary transformation into queerness. The portrayal of his parents actively subverts traditional expectations, with his mother Fe working as a police officer while his father Ed manages their home-based eatery (carinderia).  

The primary antagonists, Suarez and his associate Serge, embody a toxic, homophobic masculinity. Their violence stems from this rigid worldview, yet their “much-valued machismo” is ultimately depicted as ineffective against the town’s female leaders and the power of the zombadings. The revelation that Suarez, the architect of the homophobic killings, is himself a closeted homosexual adds another layer to this critique. The film culminates in a powerful subversion when Remington’s father, Ed, not only accepts his son’s potential queerness but willingly embraces becoming gay himself to save Remington, ultimately living happily in his new identity. This act represents a radical departure from traditional patriarchal expectations and offers a vision of fluid masculinity and acceptance.  

Reception and Discourse: A Divided Response

Critical Analysis Synthesis

The critical reception to Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings was markedly mixed, reflecting the film’s polarizing nature. Aggregators like Metacritic recorded a score of 56/100 based on a small sample of four international reviews, categorizing the response as “Mixed or Average”. This sample was evenly split, with two positive, one mixed, and one negative review. The IMDB user score settled at a modest 5.7/10 based on over 300 ratings.  

Despite the mixed aggregate scores, specific points of praise recurred across numerous reviews. The film was widely commended for its humor, described with terms like “exuberantly silly,” “laugh out loud,” “effortlessly funny,” and a “ridiculous good time,” with some noting humor specific to Filipino cultural understanding. Its subversive quality and pro-tolerance message were frequently highlighted, with critics calling it “deliciously subversive,” a “document of empowerment,” and a “blow against intolerance” that satirizes homophobia. Its originality and entertainment value were also praised, particularly by the Philippine Cinema Evaluation Board, which contrasted it favorably with formulaic local fare. Martin Escudero’s lead performance as Remington received near-universal acclaim; he was hailed as a “revelation” for his hilarious and adept portrayal of a straight man involuntarily turning gay, skillfully navigating the associated clichés. The performances of veterans Roderick Paulate and Eugene Domingo were also frequently commended. Finally, several critics noted the film’s “warmth of spirit” and “irresistible” exuberance.  

However, significant criticisms were also consistently raised. The film’s heavy reliance on gay stereotypes was a major point of contention, with reviewers decrying the “overload of gay clichés,” “mincing stereotypes,” and the presentation of a “singular,” outdated view of gay men that potentially promotes ridicule. The core premise of homosexuality as a curse needing a cure was deemed deeply problematic, sending the wrong message about LGBTQ+ identity. The comedic use of hate crimes was also found troubling by several critics. Some found the film lacked depth, describing it as having “no mission” and featuring “cardboard” characters. Technical and structural weaknesses were also noted, including “questionable continuity,” “bargain-basement effects,” an “unwieldy” narrative structure with poor pacing, and “TV-style framing”.  

Summary of Key Critical Reviews

Source	Critic (if named)	Metacritic Score	Summary of Stance/Key Points
Variety	Dennis Harvey	70	Positive: Exuberantly silly, sends up genre clichés for a pro-tolerance message; humorously politically incorrect, only “churls” would take offense.
The New York Times	Jeannette Catsoulis	70	Positive/Mixed: Questionable continuity, effects, clichés noted, but “queer-eye-for-the-undead-guy exuberance and warmth of spirit are irresistible.”
Los Angeles Times	Annlee Ellingson	60	Mixed: Ridiculously silly with low-rent special effects to boot, but “unapologetically goofy” and viewers “may laugh despite yourself.”
Village Voice	Rob Staeger	30	Negative: Preaches tolerance, but using hate crimes (even cartoonified ones) for humor is troubling, and the mincing stereotypes on display bring to mind a little kid pointing and shouting, “Homo! Homo!”
Outrage Magazine	Michael Tan	N/A	Negative: Spreads homophobic hatred via curse premise, stereotypes (predatory, effeminate), trivializes violence for comedy, promotes idea of a “cure,” reinforces negative views.
Kyoto Review	Nonon Padilla	N/A	Negative/Mixed: Criticizes “palabok” narrative, cardboard characters, lack of mission; praises Escudero/Zamora performances, some funny moments, but ultimately confusing and underdeveloped.
Screen Anarchy	Oggs Cruz	N/A	Positive: “Deliciously subversive,” intelligently crafted despite chaotic elements, effective genre blend, strong message of empowerment/tolerance, praises Escudero and Paulate.
The Last Thing I See	Brent McKnight	N/A	Positive: Ridiculous good time, funny, bizarre, satiric; low budget/campy is part of the pleasure; simple message about being true to oneself; less zombie action than expected.
User Review (IMDB)	firewalkwithme1…	N/A	Negative: Overuse of outdated stereotypes, virtually no comedic value, cardboard characters, sends wrong message about family attitudes about being a young gay person; visually enjoyable.
User Review (IMDB)	–	N/A	Positive/Mixed: LOL lowbrow comedy, more comedy than horror; Escudero is a revelation; entertaining overall despite some awkward moments and grotesque zombies.

The Representation Controversy

The debate surrounding Zombadings‘s representation of LGBTQ+ issues extended beyond mainstream critics and occurred significantly within the Filipino queer community and its advocates. This internal division highlights the complexities surrounding queer representation, particularly when employing humor, satire, and genre conventions.

Criticism was sharp from figures like Michael Tan, founder of the LGBTQIA+ magazine Outrage. He accused the film of actively spreading homophobic hatred through its core premise, its reliance on negative stereotypes (flaming, predatory effeminacy), its comedic handling of homophobic violence, and its perceived ultimate reinstatement of heterosexuality. This perspective saw the film as irresponsible and harmful, potentially contributing to negative societal views.  

However, this view was not universally shared within the community. The film reportedly received support from the local ‘bakla’ community in Lucban, where it was filmed. Furthermore, prominent national queer organizations, including Ladlad (an LGBT political party) and the Philippine LGBT Hate Crime Watch, publicly approved of the film. These groups found the film funny and did not interpret its humor as mocking hate crimes, suggesting they perceived its underlying message or satirical intent differently.  

This internal conflict was acknowledged by international critics like Dennis Harvey (Variety), who suggested the film’s pro-tolerance message, delivered with political incorrectness, was clear enough that only overly sensitive individuals (“churls”) would take offense. Filipino film scholar Roland Tolentino attributed the conflicted reception to the film’s “self-aware camp project,” suggesting that its specific blend of camp and queerness might inherently limit its potential for radical critique, thus explaining the divergent reactions. This controversy underscores the “burden of representation” often placed on queer filmmakers , where their work is intensely scrutinized for its potential impact, and differing opinions arise on whether subversive humor or camp aesthetics can effectively challenge homophobia without causing harm.  

Audience Impact

Despite the critical divisions and controversies, Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings resonated strongly with Philippine audiences. It defied initial distributor skepticism about its marketability (“no market” ) to become a surprising “sleeper hit” and “runaway hit” at the box office. Positive word-of-mouth was cited as a key factor in its success.  

Anecdotal accounts and reviews describe audiences reacting with considerable laughter and enjoyment. Lead actor Martin Escudero expressed surprise at the overwhelmingly positive audience response during the film’s premiere screening. Comments from viewers praised the film as “awesome” and highlighted Escudero’s performance. This popular appeal might be linked, as one critic suggested, to its engagement with nostalgia for older B-movies and comics, potentially targeting a broad audience seeking entertainment, perhaps with a “nine year old mental capacity” for such fare. While the film clearly connected with many viewers on an entertainment level, concerns were raised about potential negative impacts, such as the possibility of the term “zombadings” being co-opted as a derogatory slur.  

Viewing Zombadings Today: Streaming Availability

Based on the provided information, the current streaming availability of Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings appears somewhat fragmented and potentially dependent on geographic region.

Several sources indicate the film is available for free viewing on Tubi TV, particularly in the US market. Platforms like Plex, Apple TV, and Roku also list the film, often indicating availability via Tubi. GagaOOLala, an LGBTQ+-focused streaming service, also lists the title, though access may require a subscription or be region-locked. Ariztical Entertainment, the film’s distributor, provides links for DVD purchase and Video On Demand access.  

However, other sources present conflicting information. Prime Video explicitly states the title is “unavailable due to expired rights”. JustWatch, in both its US and Czech versions, reported the film as unavailable for streaming at the time of checking. Moviefone aligns with the Tubi availability , while Justdial notes the film’s existence but not a specific platform. It was also noted that the film was previously available on Netflix.  

This conflicting data suggests that while Tubi appears to be the most consistent platform offering the film (primarily for free, ad-supported viewing in certain regions), availability may fluctuate over time and differ significantly depending on the viewer’s location. Tracking the streaming status of international independent films like Zombadings years after their initial release often presents such challenges.

Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings

Remington and the Curse of the Zombadings stands as a complex and memorable artifact of 21st-century Filipino cinema. It achieved significant popular success as an independent film that dared to blend mainstream genre appeal with challenging queer themes, all within a specific cultural context. Its identity is inherently dual: a film celebrated by many for its audacious humor, subversive energy, and ultimately pro-tolerance stance, yet simultaneously condemned by others for its problematic reliance on stereotypes, its controversial central premise, and its potentially harmful comedic choices.

The film remains a unique contribution to both zombie cinema and queer cinema, particularly notable for its creation of the “zombading” figure and its bold, if contested, engagement with ‘bakla’ identity and homophobia in the Philippines. Its legacy lies not in providing easy answers but in provoking debate. It sparked, and continues to represent, important conversations about the nuances of LGBTQ+ representation, the ethical boundaries of humor and satire when dealing with marginalization and violence, and the possibilities and pitfalls of genre filmmaking as a vehicle for social commentary. Zombadings endures as a film that compels viewers to grapple with its undeniable “exuberance and warmth” alongside its “questionable” elements , leaving a lasting impression through its boldness, its acknowledged flaws, and the passionate discourse it continues to inspire.